<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big M Press Photography &#187; 70-200</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpressphotography.com/tag/70-200/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com</link>
	<description>Lighting Equipment, Lens &#38; Accessories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Canon Lens 70-200 2.8 Is</title>
		<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200 2.8 is




Which lens to get for portraits?

I'm faced with an option that I will have to live with for a while.  My funds are limited but I need some advice on which lens to get.  I have a canon 5D Mark II and am at this point seriously considering the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Lens L Series 70-200</title>
		<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-l-series-70-200/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-l-series-70-200/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-l-series-70-200/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[canon lens l series 70-200




Canon L series lens?

Canon 70 - 200 L 2.8 verses Canon 70 - 200 L 2.8 IS, is it worth the extra $$$$,


The IS lens has image stabilization, which corrects for camera shake and lets you shoot up to 3 stops slower than normal.   It is especially useful for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-l-series-70-200/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Lens 70-200 2.8</title>
		<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200 2.8




Can you give me any suggestions and pointers for taking picture at a prom/dance?

It's my first official job for my high school yearbook, and I'm not experienced taking pictures of events like this. I'm used to take pictures of nature. http://www.flickr.com/photos/caoran9238
So any suggestions for the prom? I know it's going to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Lens 18-200 2.8</title>
		<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-18-200-2-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-18-200-2-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectifs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-18-200-2-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nikon lens 18-200 2.8




nikon d300s and nikkor 105 mm f.2.8 micro lens?

ok so i bought a nikon d300s and a 105 micro lens and i have few more money left and these are my options buy the 17-55 or sigma 10-20 or nikon 16-85  18-200  a fish eye lens 10.5 mm now i [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-18-200-2-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Lens 70-200</title>
		<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[200mm f4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon 50d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon digital ixus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon digital ixus 70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon ixus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200 is ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200 price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200 review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200mm review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative instincts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital ixus 70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutter speeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[canon lens 70-200




what lens to buy between canon 24-105 or 70-200 f4 is?

I have 17-50mm 2.8 tamron/canon 50D and Im buying a new lens but cant decide between canon 24-105 or 70-200 f4 is. anybody can help me to decide?
Hi All,
Thank you for the good advise, I have bought 70-200mm F4 IS and I am [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-70-200-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Lens Vr 2.8</title>
		<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-vr-2-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-vr-2-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f2.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-vr-2-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nikon lens vr 2.8




Help with what lens I should get?

I have a nikon 18-200 VR, would getting a 50 mm f/1.4 be kind of redundant?  i'm just looking for a lens with a bigger aperture and very shallow depth of field.  The 18-200 doesn't provide those, so I was thinking 50 mm f/1.4
Also [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpressphotography.com/nikon-lens-vr-2-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Lens F2.8 Is</title>
		<link>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-f2-8-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-f2-8-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f2.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-f2-8-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[canon lens f2.8 is




Is Tamron 17-50mm F2.8(canon) a good lens?



It is a very sharp lens that gets overall very good reviews - but it does also have some weaknesses (to be honest almost any zoom lens does - you just have to know what they are so you can deal with them).  It is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpressphotography.com/canon-lens-f2-8-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

